rc modeling database | stash manager

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35

Boxart Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) RS-3001 REVOSYS

Facts

Brand:
REVOSYS
Title:
Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior
Number:
RS-3001
Scale:
1:35
Type:
Full kit
Released:
2017 New tool
Barcode:
4897083250011 (EAN)
Topic:
VK 3601 » Tanks (Vehicles)

Box contents

Plastic sprue, Photoetched fret, Decalsheet (waterslide)

Dimensions:
380x240x90 mm (15x9.4x3.5 inch)

Weight:
890 g (1.96 lbs)

Product timeline

 
REVOSYS
Rye Field Model
Full history »

Instructions

Download 12024Kb (.pdf)

Marketplace

No partner shops available

In-box reviews

External reviews
Advertisement
Panzer Modell
In-box review
Panzer Modell
Armorama
In-box review
Armorama
Armorama
In-box review
Armorama
Missing-Lynx
In-box review
Missing-Lynx

All reviews » (10 in total)

Magazines

(Tamiya Model Magazine 261)
Tamiya Model Magazine | 261
English (TOC: 11 lines)
July 2017
(Model Military International 138)
Model Military International | 138
English (TOC: 14 lines)
October 2017
(Scale Military Modeller Vol 48 Issue 566)
Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566
English (TOC: 11 lines)
May 2018

All magazines » (4 in total)

Comments

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?
1 6 October 2018, 06:34
beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.
 6 April, 22:28
beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.
 7 April, 14:15
beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.
 10 April, 21:15
beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.
 11 April, 02:11