Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | No. RS-3001 | 1:35

Fatos

Marca:

REVOSYS

Título:

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior

Número:

RS-3001

Escala:

1:35

Tipo:

Kit completo

Lançado:

2017 Produto novo

Código de barras:

4897083250011 (EAN)

Tópico:

VK 3601 » Tanques (Veículos)

Conteúdo

Árvore de plástico, Fotogravado, Decalque (dágua)

Linha do tempo do produto

 

REVOSYS

Rye Field Model

2017

 

2019

Produto novoStaticPeças novasStaticPeças novasStatic

Instruções

Download 12024Kb (.pdf)

Mercado

No partner shops available

Avaliações

Revisões externas

Propaganda

Avaliação da caixa

Panzer Modell

Avaliação da caixa

Armorama

Avaliação da caixa

Armorama

Avaliação da caixa

Missing-Lynx

Todos os comentários » (10 no total)

Revistas

Tamiya Model Magazine | 261

English (TOC: 11 lines)

July 2017

Model Military International | 138

English (TOC: 14 lines)

October 2017

Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566

English (TOC: 11 lines)

May 2018

Todas as revistas » (4 no total)

Comentários

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?

1 6 October 2018, 06:34

beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.

 6 April 2024, 22:28

beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.

 7 April 2024, 14:15

beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.

 10 April 2024, 21:15

beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.

 11 April 2024, 02:11