Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01)

2 in 1 w/ interior

REVOSYS | № RS-3001 | 1:35

Факти

Бренд:

REVOSYS

Заголовок:

Pz.Kpfw.VI Ausf C/B (VK36.01) 2 in 1 w/ interior

Номер:

RS-3001

Масштаб:

1:35

Тип:

Повний набір

Випущений:

2017 Нова прес-форма

Штрих-код:

4897083250011 (EAN)

Тема:

VK 3601 » Танки (Транспортні засоби)

Вміст коробки

Пластмасова відливка, Фототравлення, Деколь (перевідна)

Графік продукту

 

REVOSYS

Rye Field Model

2017

 

2019

Нова прес-формаStaticНові деталіStaticНові деталіStatic

Інструкції

Завантажити 12024Kb (.pdf)

Ринок

No partner shops available

Огляди "в коробці"

Зовнішні огляди

Реклама

Огляд "у коробці"

Panzer Modell

Огляд "у коробці"

Armorama

Огляд "у коробці"

Armorama

Огляд "у коробці"

Missing-Lynx

Всі відгуки » (10 загалом)

Журнали

Tamiya Model Magazine | 261

English (TOC: 11 lines)

July 2017

Model Military International | 138

English (TOC: 14 lines)

October 2017

Scale Military Modeller | Vol 48 Issue 566

English (TOC: 11 lines)

May 2018

Всі журнали » (4 загалом)

Коментарі

DONALD STEVENS
I love this kit. Full of details. Lucky enough to buy 5 of them before all the sellers jacked up the prices so high. Got them for 54.99 each and free shipping. Plan on building all the different versions. Why did DRAGON/DML give up on this kit?

1 6 October 2018, 06:34

beers
Well, thankfully scale models don't have to abide by what was existed and what didn't. We can have whatever what-ifs we want.

6 April, 22:28

beers
Perhaps, but this vehicle did exist. The hull was tested as shown, the turret was made but never mounted; the gun is the only "fictional" part, though the project for a squeeze bore 75/55mm gun was very real - it just never went anywhere, someone must have realized it was all looking quite expensive.

7 April, 14:15

beers
Expensive to make and operate, yes. Expensive to shoot? Not at all, it used the same ammunition as the Flak 36.
The squeeze-bore cannon that was supposed to go on the VK 36 01H required ~1kg of tungsten per shot, a material that was perpetually in very short supply. If not for that and the excessive barrel wear, they just might have fielded one of these.

10 April, 21:15

beers
That is what I said about the Tiger 1, yes. Still cheaper than a tank for which ammo production would have been impossible.

11 April, 02:11